16 October 2003
According to Oliver Goodenough (can that be his real name?) people possess domain-specific capacities in their evolved psychology for tangible property, tied to their emotions. And culture and law have tried to expand the notion of property into other domains - e.g. intellectual property – that probably have much weaker links to the emotions. He therefore
argues speculates that intellectual property, although a good idea formally, is might be too new for people to respect. So people who would never normally steal will swap files, even if it's behaviour characterisable as theft.
Noted during Oliver Goodenough's Natural Born Lawyers talk, at The Place of Value in a World of Facts
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Intangible property:
Tracked on 17 Oct 2003 00:06:23
Thank you for the mention and the clear statement of one of the points I was trying to make. The only clarification I would add is that the idea is offered as a working hypothesis, subject to imperical verification, and not as a firm conclusion. We are doing some of that imperical work now, and hope to follow up with more. And yes, it is my real name.
Posted by: Oliver Goodenough at 5 Nov 2003 14:49:13
Thanks for the clarification, Oliver - on both points :-)
You were clear in your talk that it was a hypothesis, so I'm sorry I wasn't clear about that in my post. I look forward to your follow up.
Posted by: Foe at 6 Nov 2003 10:56:09